Idiot? Making an ass out of themselves?
I will add this to the list of permissible insults. Apparently it is acceptable to address others as ignorant, uninformed, idiotic asses. Cool.
Edit: Also, moron can be used. Excellent.
Chicago Police Chief lays out anti-gun agenda
41 posts
• Page 1 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: Chicago Police Chief lays out anti-gun agenda
by eynon81 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:39 pm
willing to bet he hates the 4th, 5th, and 8th amendments too. Chicago Rules; Irish guys in uniform can do whatever they want.
/I still like Chicago though.
btw...turns out this guy is actually a New Yorker:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_McCarthy
/I still like Chicago though.
btw...turns out this guy is actually a New Yorker:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_McCarthy
-
eynon81 - VIP
- Posts: 19475
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:38 am
- Location: Golden, Colorado
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3875 times
- Been thanked: 1821 times
- Political Leaning: Very Conservative
Re: Chicago Police Chief lays out anti-gun agenda
by eynon81 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:44 pm
Last edited by eynon81 on Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
eynon81 - VIP
- Posts: 19475
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:38 am
- Location: Golden, Colorado
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3875 times
- Been thanked: 1821 times
- Political Leaning: Very Conservative
Re: Chicago Police Chief lays out anti-gun agenda
by exploited » Tue Feb 19, 2013 3:09 pm
As for the OP...
I think that this guy doesn't know very much about the Constitution... but that he is ultimately correct to say that the Second Amendment is dangerous to public safety. Because it is. You can argue that the danger posed by gun control is greater than the danger posed by the Second Amendment, and some here have. Some days, I'd agree with you. Others, not so much. But to say that guaranteeing the right to be armed doesn't endanger public safety, to a fairly large degree, is absurd to the extreme.
I think that this guy doesn't know very much about the Constitution... but that he is ultimately correct to say that the Second Amendment is dangerous to public safety. Because it is. You can argue that the danger posed by gun control is greater than the danger posed by the Second Amendment, and some here have. Some days, I'd agree with you. Others, not so much. But to say that guaranteeing the right to be armed doesn't endanger public safety, to a fairly large degree, is absurd to the extreme.
-
exploited - Vice President
- Posts: 23035
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 2562 times
- Been thanked: 1837 times
41 posts
• Page 1 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests