Re: Chick-Fil-A To End Anti-Gay Donations, Huckabee Am Cry
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:43 pmPolitical Crossfire Forums
Political forum discussions also covering current events, constitutional rights, and more!
https://www.political-crossfire.com/
Chick-Fil-A To End Anti-Gay Donations, Huckabee Am Cry
Page 2 of 9
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:43 pmRe: Chick-Fil-A To End Anti-Gay Donations, Huckabee Am Cry
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:45 pmRe: Chick-Fil-A To End Anti-Gay Donations, Huckabee Am Cry
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:51 pmRe: Chick-Fil-A To End Anti-Gay Donations, Huckabee Am Cry
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 5:47 pmRe: Chick-Fil-A To End Anti-Gay Donations, Huckabee Am Cry
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:39 pmI feel like the largest LGBT-advocacy group in any state probably shouldn't put the word ”Agenda” in their title. Funny, I get it, but you're not helping.
Re: Chick-Fil-A To End Anti-Gay Donations, Huckabee Am Cry
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:59 pmRe: Chick-Fil-A To End Anti-Gay Donations, Huckabee Am Cry
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:03 pmWhat makes straight right?
Nature whips up a helping of either. They are both "right".
Nature whips up a helping of either. They are both "right".
Re: Chick-Fil-A To End Anti-Gay Donations, Huckabee Am Cry
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:03 pmRe: Chick-Fil-A To End Anti-Gay Donations, Huckabee Am Cry
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:57 pmRe: Chick-Fil-A To End Anti-Gay Donations, Huckabee Am Cry
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:03 pmNo, if nature would make it "right" then the relationship would procreate the species, which it does not and cannot.
No where in nature is a homosexual relationship conducive to the continuation of the species, which is nature at its simplest. Left alone, the genes of gay males would not be passed on to any offspring, so biologically being gay helps ensure your genes are NOT passed along, which is at the core of a reproducing living organism. It is nature, you can argue with me, but you cannot argue with nature.
THATS what makes it wrong. That and the fact that man was not born to be with man. Otherwise a man would have a vagina, he doesn't, he has an anus for shitting only. It's not biologically designed for intercourse.
Mod edit. -u
No where in nature is a homosexual relationship conducive to the continuation of the species, which is nature at its simplest. Left alone, the genes of gay males would not be passed on to any offspring, so biologically being gay helps ensure your genes are NOT passed along, which is at the core of a reproducing living organism. It is nature, you can argue with me, but you cannot argue with nature.
THATS what makes it wrong. That and the fact that man was not born to be with man. Otherwise a man would have a vagina, he doesn't, he has an anus for shitting only. It's not biologically designed for intercourse.
Mod edit. -u