It's now against the rules to have the same avatar as another poster, which means at any moment, someone could change their av to match mine and we would BOTH then be in violation of the rules.
This is a stupid rule. Why was it added?
New Rule makes no sense
22 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: New Rule makes no sense
by JDHURF » Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:52 pm
I don't get it either. No one owns their avatars. If there are two posters using the same avatar how will it be determined who had theirs first? How will it be determined who to "possibly ban"" How will it be argued that there was a problem and that the intention was problematic?
What is with your avatar Philly? Why is it NAB's with the addition of RIP? I don't understand what is going on. Never mind, I get it after seeing the relevant thread.
What is with your avatar Philly? Why is it NAB's with the addition of RIP? I don't understand what is going on. Never mind, I get it after seeing the relevant thread.
Last edited by JDHURF on Fri Oct 19, 2012 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
JDHURF - Governor
- Posts: 2628
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:53 am
- Location: Desolation Row
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 266 times
- Been thanked: 254 times
- Political Leaning: Libertarian Socialist
Re: New Rule makes no sense
by Bill_in_Bethlehem » Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:57 pm
this post violates several other rules - you are asking for trouble here
-
Bill_in_Bethlehem - Congressman
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: Bethlehem, PA
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 45 times
- Political Leaning: Middle of the Road
Re: New Rule makes no sense
by Bill_in_Bethlehem » Fri Oct 19, 2012 1:03 pm
-
Bill_in_Bethlehem - Congressman
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: Bethlehem, PA
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 45 times
- Political Leaning: Middle of the Road
Re: New Rule makes no sense
by Bill_in_Bethlehem » Fri Oct 19, 2012 1:08 pm
-
Bill_in_Bethlehem - Congressman
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: Bethlehem, PA
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 45 times
- Political Leaning: Middle of the Road
Re: New Rule makes no sense
by JDHURF » Fri Oct 19, 2012 1:46 pm
Taking NAB's sig as well is just plain pushing it Philly. I keep thinking I'm reading NAB's posts. What is the meaning of all this?
-
JDHURF - Governor
- Posts: 2628
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:53 am
- Location: Desolation Row
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 266 times
- Been thanked: 254 times
- Political Leaning: Libertarian Socialist
Re: New Rule makes no sense
by jimmyz » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:13 pm
-
jimmyz - Governor
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:26 pm
- Location: Arizona - A concealed and open carry state
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 425 times
- Political Leaning: Conservative
22 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests