Re: Should the Second Amendment be revisited?
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:18 pmPolitical Crossfire Forums
Political forum discussions also covering current events, constitutional rights, and more!
https://www.political-crossfire.com/
Should the Second Amendment be revisited?
https://www.political-crossfire.com/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1310
Page 29 of 31
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:18 pmRe: Should the Second Amendment be revisited?
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:27 pmlol
Re: Should the Second Amendment be revisited?
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:48 pmRe: Should the Second Amendment be revisited?
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:50 pmRe: Should the Second Amendment be revisited?
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:53 pmRe: Should the Second Amendment be revisited?
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:50 pm"intolerant of 2nd amendment right"
*chuckles*
*chuckles*
Re: Should the Second Amendment be revisited?
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:36 amRe: Should the Second Amendment be revisited?
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:44 amconsidering you believe that what is not considered free speech is an initiation of force, and denial of service based on skin color i would wager to guess is not protected speech, you would have to accept that it is an initiation of force. don't make me cite the relevant thread you made this claim in either. you know which one it was.
regardless, you're attempting to move the goal posts. removal of a right is not an initiation of force. but either way NO ONE IS ACTUALLY PERFORMING THAT ACTION so it is entirely irrelevant. supporting it is not an initiation of force either. and either way it is not intolerance. that's just a gross bastardization of the english language to claim such a thing as "intolerance" of non-existent, philosophical concepts and comparing it to a discussion of tolerance/intolerance in regards to actual people.
regardless, you're attempting to move the goal posts. removal of a right is not an initiation of force. but either way NO ONE IS ACTUALLY PERFORMING THAT ACTION so it is entirely irrelevant. supporting it is not an initiation of force either. and either way it is not intolerance. that's just a gross bastardization of the english language to claim such a thing as "intolerance" of non-existent, philosophical concepts and comparing it to a discussion of tolerance/intolerance in regards to actual people.
Re: Should the Second Amendment be revisited?
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:54 amRe: Should the Second Amendment be revisited?
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:07 ammore positive negative liberty bullshit