Sandy Hook: I'm Probably A Crazy Person

[The Comrade]

yeah watched five minutes of that video and clicked out of it. complete nonsense. the arguments that missiles took down the WTC and hit the pentagon are based on firmer evidence.

[exploited]

These things aren't meant to be taken seriously... I just like reading and watching for sheer entertainment value. This one is the best since 9/11.

[Precocity]

[The Comrade]

i don't need to watch the video to respond to the arguments from the video but thanks for playing. and i addressed both those points already but thank god you read the thread before you decided to post a snarky comment.

[RoyBatty]

I survived the 2004 Tsunami. Was in Phuket. I would guesstimate that I personally saw around a dozen or more people lose their lives on that day, and one of them was a little Thai girl that couldn't have been more than 7.

The first thing I noticed when I returned to Bangkok and talked to my buds was that I was fighting back spontaneous laughter for about a week. Don't ask me why, I guess it was just neurons and synapses being overloaded and my brain's way of shaking it off was to get me laughing.

Either way, I saw the vid and all I took from it was a guy, having just experienced literally the worst thing that can happen to a father, trying to hype himself up before going on national TV, and that once he started to get in position, the reality started to hit him again. And that's how the brutality of this kind of stuff happens, it hits you when you're not expecting it, in waves of almost uncontrollable emotion. While it makes folks look like complete nutjobs, there's nothing untoward or strange about it, just based on what I've experienced.

[The Comrade]

yeah something people need to realize is that laughter isn't really an expression of joy and all that. at least not explicitly. it is, at it's biological roots, a physical expression of fear and anxiety.

[HeatherG]

[HeatherG]

@Emerald- all of your responses are exactly what my mom said when i talked to her about it. The whole cover up is what gets me the most. and iv tried to figure it out. so maybe there were actually no kids at school that day and the parents were paid off to SAY their kids were there and died...thats still 400 or so families willing to go along with that, plus all of their family and friends...impossible. Then i thought maybe just the areas that the shooter went had no kids and everyone else was made to believe there was a shooter there...then thats only 27 families in on it. its still a hell of a lot of people to count on to keep their mouths shut. this predicament is my biggest argument against the conspiracy.

and i get what Stratego is saying, that people make mistakes and maybe the cover up people didnt have their vitamins and accidentally created pages before the shooting-but still if this is what these people are claiming it to be, i would think the people behind it would check and check and then check again so things like that wouldnt happen.

[HeatherG]

[WizardfromOz]

Well I suppose no one has ever seen anyone extremely nervous give a self conscious laugh.

But our intrepid investigator does not highlight the very next line on the Facebook page. It says "We know Emily has been a victim..................."

I suppose in whatever fantasy world this person lives in he has never heard of the "Bush telegraph or the jungle drums" Does he really think that an official announcement about the deaths were done BEFORE the families were notified. I believe on the day there was a delay in the announcement until a complete list of victims had been compiled. If you are the first family told, you have to wait till the other 25 were told, then the information was released officially.