You can stop laughing now.

[The Dharma Bum]

[eynon81]

[Homer]

[Winchester]

[The Dharma Bum]

[Homer]

[The Dharma Bum]

OK, but how about a situation like the one I presented, when the police shot an innocent man in the London subway because he was brown-skinned. Were they justified in doing that?

Because it is the inevitable result of the type of authoritarian policy you are advocating.

[Gremlin]

Gather round kids, hypothetical time.

Lets say there is a terrorist running around with a bomb strapped to him, and lets say there is an armed drone in the skies. Now if it hasnt been hacked yet and the target has been identified. Let us say the hellfire hits this said terrorist between the eyes. How often is this terrorist going to be out of the blast radius of innocent people?

If your a proponent of armed drones in the skies over a peaceful population, i have to question your sanity.
We all know that bomb strapped terrorist are oh so common and require armed drones over our heads.


I have to ask, for every "SUSPECTED" terrorist killed overseas, 49 innocent people die in double tap attacks.
So we have a government/administration that thinks its ok to strike, then strike again when help arrives killing a lot of innocent people.
Yet im suppose to believe armed drones is A-OK and i got nothing to worry about.... "we" of course being a much bigger threat to the political classes then bearded brown people 14,000 miles away.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... istan.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/OPINION/10/ ... drone.war/

If you like,... the actual report.

http://livingunderdrones.org/download-report/

[Homer]

[eynon81]