Page 52 of 91
Re: Twitter Wars
Posted:
Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:20 pm
by spacemonkey
I doubt NK could even hit an actual target. It takes all they got just to hit the ocean.
Re: Twitter Wars
Posted:
Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:05 am
by John Galt
#chapstickawiddick
Re: Twitter Wars
Posted:
Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:27 pm
by Kane
I love the response to the SOTU. Looking at the wrong camera, water, being terrible at it (jindal) and now...drool.
The message was good though IMO.
Re: Twitter Wars
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2018 2:50 am
by Philly
I didn't watch it or read a summary of it, but recruiting a retarded inbred legacy admission to congress from the Kennedy family - one who is like 4 generations removed from any of the Kennedy's who ever actually mattered - to give the response, I'm confident that the they nailed this one. Political dynasties are at an all time high level of approval and popularity among voters.
Re: Twitter Wars
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:21 am
by Winchester
Re: Twitter Wars
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:18 am
by Saz
Re: Twitter Wars
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2018 12:07 pm
by Kane
Yeah it was a...bad choice. But they were weighing a bunch of things: people wanted to put up Kamala, Biden, etc but they're all potentially running in 2020. Put any of them up there and you have the issue of fairness/party choosing winners and losers again.
Re: Twitter Wars
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2018 1:17 pm
by John Galt
So if you get the rebuttal message, since the Democrat Party doesn't want to pick winners, you're certainly a loser?
Re: Twitter Wars
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2018 1:48 pm
by Kane
Re: Twitter Wars
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2018 2:19 pm
by Winchester