Political Crossfire Forums

i believe san fransisco leads the nation in homeless per capita. homeless population in SF is 7,500. this number was reached by the San Fransisco Department of Homelessness http://hsh.sfgov.org/research-reports/s ... t-reports/ (one must question why a department exists if there is no problem)

THAT SAID, you are conflating homelessness and illegal immigration.


75% of homeless are not-latino.

one third are white, less than that black, and 22% latino (3% refused to answer or didn't know)

this out of an entire population of 870,887

so 0.8% of the population of San Fran is homeless. And 0.18% of the population of San Francisco are homeless latinos. I'm not sure about their immigration status to be sure, but if half of them are illegals, which I would find unlikely, this means that of the people in San Fran 0.09% of them are homeless illegals. This is far less than the 0.31% of the population who are homeless whites. as a whole the population of san fran hardly has any latinos, only around 15%. blacks make up only 6% of the population but almost a third of the homeless population though.

SF has a mild climate, and has a proportionately high number of bleeding hearts. Portland and Seattle, same deal. None of us are suffering, and as Galt pointed out, immigration and homelessness aren't actually very much related.

Used to be a good hard winter freeze would create a homeless population barrier. Just imagining all those mentally ill people slowly freezing to death in the gutter is the sort of thing that could warm even Spacemonkey's heart.

West coast homeless are aggressive as shit. Especially sf.

How come white privilege don't prevent all whites from being homeless? My guess = WP = BS.

how come papa johns won't return my phone calls about the nuclear triade?

That said, I don't like Papa John's.