Page 13 of 18
Re: oprah
Posted:
Wed Jan 17, 2018 7:26 pm
by The Comrade
no it's not we sun burn easy you idiot
Re: oprah
Posted:
Wed Jan 17, 2018 7:28 pm
by Philly
haha comrade is white. loser
Re: oprah
Posted:
Wed Jan 17, 2018 7:42 pm
by exploited
Not just white, he is clearly pasty white. I tan up like a bronze God, not sure why he is projecting his shitty sallow chalkdust colouring on the rest of us.
Re: oprah
Posted:
Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:53 pm
by JDHURF
Re: oprah
Posted:
Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:37 pm
by John Galt
He didn't say all African nations were shitholes, he allegedly implied at least two of them are. Further, not wanting to accept people from them is because the people are fleeing and likely aren't high value in terms of what they offer, unlike people that had a first world education, for example, to pick a first world nation at random, Norway.
Just because I won't say everything the man says it's racist doesn't mean I support him at all. In fact I'm saying this because I think it is extremely counterproductive towards the goal of DACA solution and ultimately ending his reign as it's the wrong tree to be barking at. In this case it was undiplomatic and he shouldn't have said it for that reason. It's also shows he has a fundamental misunderstanding of the value of immigrants. China has similar policies to apparently what he wants and they are poorer for it as they have a brain drain and no one to replace it. Yeah, immigrants from poorer nations often compete for jobs against high school dropouts here. So what? High school dropouts were given opportunity and they wasted it. Speaking facts about how immigrants are net gain to the country they immigrate to is far more productive. If Congress passes a continuation budget and reasonably addresses DACA, and it goes on his desk, he'll have to sign it if public opinion is behind the bill. But if it's a story about how he's being besieged about comments he made in private which are just taboo to say but most people agree with... Then he won't as he'll feel that the people are behind him, and many will be
Re: oprah
Posted:
Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:09 pm
by The Comrade
Re: oprah
Posted:
Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:11 pm
by The Comrade
Re: oprah
Posted:
Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:18 pm
by JDHURF
Re: oprah
Posted:
Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:43 pm
by John Galt
I bet you thought Hillary was gonna win too. I'm telling you, it's the wrong play.
I'm not going to watch something that says in the title "a news caster gets emotional about the news". That's not journalism and should be grounds for dismissal, but if course all cable news is trash so I guess this is what we get these days. Still, I won't willingly submit myself to enduring watching that
As for my assertions, i didn't think I'd need to explain what a plural word is. A plural word is something that means "more than one", or, to put it the way I asserted it "at least two". This is synonymous with one another, so he allegedly said that more than one African nation was a shithole
Re: oprah
Posted:
Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:21 am
by JDHURF