Page 4 of 8
Re: Are Parties the way to go?
Posted:
Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:58 pmby Boris Johnson
Re: Are Parties the way to go?
Posted:
Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:59 pmby Sazari
Re: Are Parties the way to go?
Posted:
Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:59 pmby The Comrade
it will certainly foster debate but they can be their own group if they want.
but to be honest i don't see how they can get along with any group or avoid the problem of "WUTS YUR GUN LUK LYKE" threads. they're just cantankerous people.
Re: Are Parties the way to go?
Posted:
Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:01 pmby OGPhilly
Looks like we're all too free minded to fit into these HQs anyway so instead let's each have our own HQs. Philly HQ, Comrade HQ, foadi HQ, Boris HQ, Sazari HQ etc. if anyone is enough of a dickrider they can always join someone else's HQ.
Re: Are Parties the way to go?
Posted:
Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:01 pmby Boris Johnson
Well lets explore Dak's unusually lucid proposal.
How about people are just allowed to say 'who wants to join the megatron extremo's party, here's our list of core principles' and if say 10 people sign up, well that's a party.
Of course some sort of check against Internets retardation might be needed.
Re: Are Parties the way to go?
Posted:
Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:02 pmby Sazari
Re: Are Parties the way to go?
Posted:
Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:03 pmby Sazari
Re: Are Parties the way to go?
Posted:
Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:05 pmby Daktoria
Re: Are Parties the way to go?
Posted:
Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:07 pmby Sazari
Re: Are Parties the way to go?
Posted:
Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:08 pmby Boris Johnson