White House petition to make DDoS legal protest

[Zeugma]

[exploited]

I think it is telling as well. It clearly reveals the few members incapable of engaging their common sense, or enabling their bullshit filter.

Strikes are not f**k DDoS attacks. Sit-ins are not DDoS attacks. Only an intellectual infant would make such illogical comparisons. The nature of the actions are different, the means of preventing or punishing them are different, and the only similarity they share is that they are intended to disrupt... Which is like comparing talking on a cellphone in a movie to shooting everyone watching, on the basis that they are both disruptive.

Only a true imbecile would argue DDoS attacks are and should be illegal while simultaneously arguing they are legitimate protest.

Part of civil disobedience is taking the punishment. In fact, that is the entire point: to demonstrate the greater harm by forcing authority to punish you. So I'm not sure what the point of this thread is. DDoS should not be legal, and it should not be recognized as legitimate protest (whatever that means), and so what is there to argue?

[Zeugma]

[exploited]

What the hell are you talking about? "Defining the limits?" Huh?

Go ahead and do your DDoS attacks. But don't bitch when you get persecuted for the damages you've inflicted. No one here has even argued they should be legal, so its almost like you want us to pass a law listing acceptable illegal protest actions.

What is the point of this thread?

[JDHURF]

[Precocity]

[exploited]

Ah yes. Illegal actions are acceptable forms of protest. Guess I better go burn down that McDonalds I didn't want coming into town.

[exploited]

[JDHURF]

[eric]